Englishfor English speakers
A2
employment English
Meaning employment meaning
What does employment mean?
Definitions in simple English
employment
employment
Synonyms employment synonyms
What other words have the same or similar meaning as employment?
employment English » English
Topics employment topics
What do people use employment to talk about?
-
What words refer to a person's occupation?
-
What words are used of finding a job?
-
What words refer to a person's job?
Examples employment examples
How do I use employment in a sentence?
Simple sentences
Workers are taking a financial beating in the employment crisis.
Unfortunately, full employment can no longer be taken for granted.
He has been without employment for a month.
He came to Tokyo in search of employment.
She found employment as a typist.
Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
We know that many employment relationships of people who have just immigrated to Germany are unproblematic.
However, we also experience again and again employment relationships in which immigrants have to work under unacceptable conditions and are extremely exploited.
He is seeking employment.
Movie subtitles
In view of the above, you are desmissed immediately from your employment with the City and are without claim to any further wages.
By stipulation with defense attorneys that this is a true film record taken at Strand by Ted Fitzgerald, in employment as a news cameraman I hereby present this film as state's Exhibit A.
It is difficult to go ahead with a family business unless it has another employment.
It circulates money, gives employment, gives people laughs.
And here's a letter which certainly won't handicap you in seeking employment.
Is this the Atlas Employment Agency?
Is there a good employment agency in the town?
And, at his heels, leashed in like hounds, would famine, sword and fire crouch for employment.
Don't you think some quiet town at first and get employment there for a while?
So I've come to ask you to reconsider leaving my employment.
I've been all over town. All the employment offices and the USES.
May I have this gentleman's employment card?
From the Dupont Employment Agency. - Ah, yes.
Go to the employment office.
Grinby employs several boys. It shall give employment to you.
If you go through with this case. it's going to throw 500 people out of employment.
Why should an ex-convict, seek employment. in the home of a man known to the world as a great detective?
The agency tells me that you've just arrived, from France, - and are seeking employment. - Oui, madame.
FITZGIBBON: And where, may I ask, are you expecting to find employment?
Yeah, I know a lot of people there, we'll soon find an employment for you.
Those questions need not necessarily be restricted to the G.I. Bill of Rights. employment, insurance and such.
From the Dupont Employment Agency.
Go to the employment office. They'll give you a work permit.
The employment office at Valmelaina sent me.
I strongly recommend against his employment.
Who soon finds employment as a chemist. And under the name of..
But, uh.well, all I mean is, if this keeps up, I may have to seek other employment.
The Crawford Employment Agency sent me.
Yes, sir. Oh, there's a Miss Blake here sent by the Crawford Employment Agency.
Same employment agency send you that sent me?
Well, now. And where, may I ask, are you expecting to find employment?
All the employment offices and the USES.
It's not a problem for the Employment Exchange.
You wish us to find other employment right away?
News and current affairs
As Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff have shown in their book This Time is Different, over the long sweep of history, post-crisis recoveries in output and employment tend to be decidedly subpar.
How can growth be revived when austerity will almost surely mean a further decrease in aggregate demand, sending output and employment even lower?
A long-recognized principle is that balanced expansion of taxes and spending stimulates the economy; if the program is well designed (taxes at the top, combined with spending on education), the increase in GDP and employment can be significant.
If Europe - particularly the European Central Bank - were to borrow, and re-lend the proceeds, the costs of servicing Europe's debt would fall, creating room for the kinds of expenditure that would promote growth and employment.
If this is more than lip service, and if she really carries out a serious reform of the German welfare state's incentive structure, the result could be higher employment and structural economic growth.
High construction employment has been good for American workers in the past half-decade - a period that has not produced much good for them.
By some reckonings, more than two-thirds of the increase in output and employment over the past six years has been real estate-related, reflecting both new housing and households borrowing against their homes to support a consumption binge.
Eight to ten million people will have to shift employment from services and construction into exports and import-competing goods, implying that structural unemployment will rise.
Should not the Fed step in and replace them with its own purchases of long-term US Treasury bonds, thereby keeping long-term interest rates at a level conducive to full employment?
Falling employment lowers wage and salary incomes.
Yet, despite all this, employment remained stagnant: net job creation in the United States continues to stall.
This does not mean that employment in America cannot grow.
The logic of stagnant employment is not that adding jobs to the American economy is impossible, but that demand growth is insufficient to create more jobs than are lost.
The output gap reflects a deficit of more than 12 million jobs - the number of jobs needed to return to the economy's peak 2007 employment level and absorb the 125,000 people who enter the labor force each month.
By capturing a growing share of world markets for manufactures and other non-primary products, these countries increased their domestic employment opportunities in high-productivity activities.
Pessimism about employment is alarmingly high among young people, while corruption and government mismanagement are regarded as being widespread.
Eliminating or reducing this trade gap without depressing economic activity and employment in Greece requires that the country export more and import less.
Growing discrimination in employment, housing, and education affects not just immigrants and their children; it harms our societies as a whole.
Instead, political leaders must use these windfalls to invest in innovation, promote sustainable businesses, and encourage new patterns of decent, long-lasting employment.
From the 1980's through the mid-2000's, employment has increasingly lagged GDP in economic recoveries.
It is difficult to see the US re-attaining full employment anytime soon.
From 1993 to 1998, the US created millions of jobs, which raised the employment rate by 5.4 percentage points.
If employment began rising at this rate in 2010, it would take until 2015 before it reached its pre-recession level.
And slow recovery in the US will drag down recovery in other advanced countries, reducing their employment as well.
The view that flexibility is the key factor in employment is no longer tenable.
The truth is that all the net employment growth in the US economy over the last 20 years has been in the non-tradable sector, where Americans don't have to compete.
Leading drivers of employment growth have been government, health care, and, until the crisis, construction.
While this is just one part of a much more complex story, it seems unlikely that these and other non-tradable sectors can sustain employment growth in the future.
But, according to this view, as the dollar's value declines, US exports will become more attractive to foreigners and American employment will rise, with labor re-allocated to the newly-vibrant export sector.
When forced to choose between full employment and price stability, the international finance economists say that the Fed will choose price stability, because its institutional memory of the 1970's, when inflation ran rampant, remains very strong.
Falling employment lowers wage and salary incomes. The higher prices of food and energy depress real incomes further.