NAFTA English

Meaning NAFTA meaning

What does NAFTA mean?

NAFTA

— noun (= North American Free Trade Agreement) an agreement for free trade between the United States and Canada and Mexico; became effective in 1994 for ten years

Synonyms NAFTA synonyms

What other words have the same or similar meaning as NAFTA?

NAFTA English » English

North American Free Trade Agreement

Examples NAFTA examples

How do I use NAFTA in a sentence?

Movie subtitles

With NAFTA the two of you are in bed together. His dirt rubs off on your side of the sheets.

I nearly lost my seat over NAFTA.

I voted against NAFTA and favored tax incentives for domestic manufacturing.

You know. my family owns most of the land. So, he's given us a great opportunity with NAFTA.

His family's involved with the NAFTA factories. A very old family, too.

NAFTA is to be expanded into every country in this hemisphere.

As NAFTA expands it will take on the role of the American Union.

International agreements like NAFTA, GATT - or APEC were just stepping stones in the formation of the N.A.U.

Building on the massive displacement of humanity, caused by globalization, - the New World Order is rapidly constructing the physical infrastructure - of the North American Union - the NAFTA superhighway control grid.

We took to the air over central Texas to get a birds-eye view - of the Trans-Texas Corridor which is under construction and - will form the heart of the Trans-NAFTA superhighway system.

The next stage of this world government plan is to have a - transportation control, and that is called the NAFTA superhighway - or in Texas called the Trans-Texas Corridor.

The I-35 NAFTA Corridor starts deep inside Mexico and travels - through the middle of the United States and ends in Central Canada.

What is also interesting to note, that the NAFTA Headquarters - is in Mexico, and controls the United States trade, and rules - against United States Congress, and no one seems to challenge it.

This trend is accelerating under the - NAFTA highway system and is meant to re-wild more than half the country.

NAFTA makes things even more difficult for you because. the border's disappearing.

Governments are nothing more than puppets and strings. in a world where NAFTA can overrule the Supreme Court.

Remember, the border's right there. With NAFTA the two of you are in bed together.

Candidate Obama told American workers that he was going to get them out of NAFTA and GATT and he's already breaking those promises.

Candidate Obama told desperate factory workers in speech after speech that he was going to renegotiate NAFTA and GATT to make it more fair for American workers.

After NAFTA, a lot of these jobs went to the South Pole.

Fucking NAFTA!

It's gonna continue to work for years. NAFTA makes things even more difficult for you because. the border's disappearing.

First of all they're proposing a North American Tribunal, - which would be similar to what we have in Chapter 11 of the NAFTA agreement, - which is trumped by international law.

NAFTA led to a flooding of the Mexican market with cheap American corn.

That agreement was called the NAFTA and it was a marriage between North America, and Mexico.

Obama pledged that he would end NAFTA and GATT and has since fought to expand both of them.

It is absolutely true that NAFTA was a mistake.

President Obama is promoting the creation of a North American Union and is attempting to expand NAFTA and GATT.

Remember, it was Bill Clinton who gave us NAFTA.

News and current affairs

We have failed to understand that a North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) that achieves its full potential cannot be accomplished on the cheap.

NAFTA was conceived under the assumption that expanded trade would trickle down benefits to all in the three countries.

Regretfully, this corporate-driven NAFTA exacerbated the disparities and asymmetries between Mexico and its two richer northern neighbors.

Moreover, throughout NAFTA's lifetime income and wealth have been further concentrated within the elite sectors of US and Canadian society.

Given this, freer trade, such as with the NAFTA countries (Canada, the US, and Mexico), and more hospitable terms for foreign investment, especially in energy, should top President Dilma Rouseff's agenda.

The good news about NAFTA is that there is little news about NAFTA.

That quiet, so different from the protests that greeted the North American Free Trade Area's creation a decade ago, reflects NAFTA's clear achievement in facilitating and integrating economic exchange among its three partners.

Next week's meeting between the Mexican and American presidents should take advantage of this success to push NAFTA forward in creative new ways.

Luckily, a road map for NAFTA exists.

Although his unorthodox suggestion met with skepticism, his ideas established an agenda that NAFTA's three partners should pursue.

Because, from Mexico's perspective, NAFTA has not yet achieved one of its key goals: to deliver the benefits of free trade to all of the country's regions and sectors.

For NAFTA to realize its full potential and move the convergence process, opening borders to trade and reducing tariff barriers are not enough.

Since its founding in 1994, NAFTA has been characterized (at best) by a bilateral management of issues and problems. Too often, the US has taken a unilateral approach.

Instead, their campaigns' treatment of US foreign policy has been reduced to endless debates about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and about the wisdom of the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

As Democrats suggest renegotiating NAFTA, Asian countries are watching with increasing trepidation.

Indeed, Northeast Asia would become the third major axis of regional economic integration, following the EU and NAFTA.

But if the proposals discussed in Beijing last month are realized, the resulting FTA could surpass NAFTA in its degree of integration and importance to the world economy.

Since its founding in 1994, NAFTA has been characterized (at best) by a bilateral management of issues and problems.

While the European Commission model may not be what NAFTA needs, the governments of Canada, Mexico, and the US should establish a permanent mechanism for channeling ideas and proposals, and transforming those ideas into action.

Having excluded energy from the original NAFTA talks, Canada and Mexico are now willing to engage with the US on a common energy strategy.