Englishfor English speakers
Marx English
Meaning Marx meaning
What does Marx mean?
Marx
Synonyms Marx synonyms
What other words have the same or similar meaning as Marx?
Marx English » English
Examples Marx examples
How do I use Marx in a sentence?
Movie subtitles
Do you know the works of Karl Marx?
That good old man believes in food just as you believe in Karl Marx.
May I add, sir, it was with great amazement. that I found a copy of Karl Marx's Capital on your night table, sir.
But Marx wasn't a German.
Marx was a Jew.
Who but a Nazi would deny that Karl Marx was a German, because he was a Jew?
Not a word or I'll tell them you're Harpo Marx.
Do I have to be a communist to read Karl Marx?
If it isn't my old friend Hart, Schaffner, and Karl Marx.
I said Karl Marx, not Groucho.
How could I with the three Marx Brothers breathing down my neck?
Masaryk, Marx, Lenin, Seneca, Schopenhauer.
Masaryk, Marx and Seneca, comrade teacher- do they go together?
They see trouble coming up, take my word for it, they'll attack and they won't give a damn what Marx said.
Chico Marx tells me you should give me a nickel.
Chico Marx.
Karl Marx.
J. marx, 49 Frederickstrasse, Karlstadt.
There we were, the queen of diamonds and me, looking like, I dunno, Gaucho Marx.
Gaucho Marx.
There we were, the queen of diamonds and me looking like, I dunno, Gaucho Marx.
All things considered, Gershwin and Armstrong have defeated Karl Marx.
This is the age of Marx and Freud, Arindam.
It wasn't Marx. Another communist said it.
After all, was Marx and German.
With your right eye on Marx,.and your left on the Bible,.you've become ideologically cross-eyed!
Marx.
Groucho Marx.
Karl Marx and Keynes on the floor.
Erno's been teaching me the beauty of Karl Marx.
News and current affairs
LONDON - Groucho Marx has always been my favorite Marxist.
Maybe it's no coincidence that Groucho Marx was an American citizen.
Marx and Mao are probably spinning in their graves.
In the reform period, this misreading of Marx morphed into an unrestrained pursuit of material gain devoid of morality.
Indeed, its malleability is the reason it has overcome periodic crises over the centuries and outlived critics from Karl Marx on.
Karl Marx wrote that history always repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce.
Groucho Marx once famously quipped that he did not want to join any club that would have him as a member.
A century and a half ago, Karl Marx both gloomily and exuberantly predicted that the modern capitalism he saw evolving would prove incapable of producing an acceptable distribution of income.
Ever since, mainstream economists have earned their bread and butter patiently explaining why Marx was wrong.
So far, every prediction in the modern era that mankind's lot will worsen, from Thomas Malthus to Karl Marx, has turned out to be spectacularly wrong.
And, despite a disconcerting fall in labor's share of income in recent decades, the long-run picture still defies Marx's prediction that capitalism would prove immiserating for workers.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were Germans.
Even Marx knew that the iron laws of economics could not be overcome by wishful thinking.
Marx, however, is far from dead; not least in Uruguay, and perhaps not elsewhere.
Karl Marx famously wrote that history repeats itself as farce.
Everything in this new China - where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) still rules, but the ideas of Karl Marx are as dead as they are in Russia - is for sale, even the trappings of its Maoist past.
From the writings of the earliest modern commentators on the drivers of socio-economic growth and decline - Adam Smith, Edward Gibbon, Thomas Malthus, David Ricardo, and Karl Marx - we see that concern about exhausting resources is not new.
The left, which had previously looked to Marx, lost its bearings.
Even Marx justified British rule in India on these grounds.
Wealth would grow, Marx argued, but would benefit the few, not the many: the forest of upraised arms looking for work would grow thicker and thicker, while the arms themselves would grow thinner and thinner.
This is an appropriate European compromise between the theory that profit comes from exploitation (Marx) and the view that it results from transactions that make both parties happier than they were before (Friedman).
I do not believe in Karl Marx's iron laws of history.
Or was that Groucho Marx?